I have to disagree. Personally I feel that the first film we were able to unravel how Erik Lehnsherr created and became the persona ‘Magneto’ while we have yet to see Charles Xavier journey as he transitions into the figure ‘Professor X’ as seen in the X-men trilogy.
I was honestly hoping they wouldn’t concentrate on just one of these characters actually, but found a way to convey their stories equally.
See, I don’t get this confession because if you love Charles, you should know that he is a BADASSMOTHERFUCKER. Legs or not, he kicked ass all over the place. He was always in the thick of things even when he was in the wheelchair.
That’s what I want. I want The Brotherhood to be in some serious shit, turn down help from the X-Men out of pride and have Charles ride roughshod over Erik’s decision and save his ass. Because he can, and he DID, many many times…
^^^ This.
+1
I, too, want angry-rugby-bamf!Charles, and I agree with almost everything stated in the above text posts. But X-Men:...
I understand the drama point, I do, I swear, but excuse me, the first movie was all about Erik struggle with vengeance...
Yes, yes, yes, times eleventy!
It’s also marketed primarily as X-Men, which Erik and the Brotherhood aren’t.
I want to see an angry, rugby-playing, BAMF!Charles in XMFC2. I want to see that journey that gets him to Professor X,...
^^^^^ THIS!!!!!!!! If the writers were really brave, they would have the guts to focus on a disabled superhero and his...
How about… the sequel should focus on Charles and Erik’s undying love for each other and should have all the homoerotic...
Furthermore, what’s the point of representation and re-affirming the personhood of disabled bodies if you refuse to LET...
Absofuckinglutely.
“Professor X gets taken...story” kicks off...comics, too. It...
IDK. I feel like that might be a better plot for a third movie. I don’t think we’re there thematically yet. Actually I...
I think the reason people are nervous is because Matthew Vaughn said they were adding a new villain because Erik needs...